Millennium Post

The How and why of Partition

The partition of Punjab in mid-August 1947 took place as part of a negotiated settlement brokered by the British between the Indian National Congress, the All-India Muslim League and the Sikhs of Punjab to partition India and transfer power to India and Pakistan. The total population of the undivided Punjab Province was 33 million. It included territories directly administered by the British and several princely states. Punjab was a Muslim majority province while Hindus and Sikhs together made up a very large minority of 44-47 per cent.

The principle on which India and Punjab were divided was that Muslim-majority areas were separated from the rest of India and given to Pakistan. The demand to partition India was made by the main communal party of Muslims, the All-India Muslim League. It insisted that Indian Muslims were not a minority (one-fourth of the total population of India) but a separate nation by virtue of their Islamic faith and culture. When the Muslim League demanded partition of India, the Sikhs of Punjab demanded the same principle to be applied to Punjab. The Indian National Congress wanted to keep India united but realising that the Muslim League was insistent on the partition of India, on 8 March 1947, it threw its weight behind the Sikh demand for the partition of Punjab.

Viceroy Mountbatten came to the conclusion that the partition of India had become inevitable. Therefore on 3 June 1947, the Partition Plan was announced which required Punjab and Bengal assemblies to vote on whether they wanted to keep their provinces united or partitioned. Both the assemblies voted in favour of partitioning their provinces.

The actual transfer of power to India and Pakistan proved to be bloody and bitter. Some people have described it as one of the 10 great tragedies of the 20th century. The estimated loss of life during the partition of India is one million.

For Punjab alone, the loss of life is estimated somewhere between 5,00,000-8,00,000 and 10 million people were forced to flee for their lives. More importantly, after World War II, the first case of ethnic cleansing took place in Punjab. Therefore, it bore the brunt of the partition violence. Thus at the end of 1947, all traces of a Muslim presence in the Indian East Punjab were wiped out, except for some Muslims remaining in the tiny princely state of Malerkotla. In the Pakistani West Punjab, Hindus and Sikhs became conspicuous by their absence.

Given the fact that the pre-partition Punjab had a robust legacy of a ‘live and let live’ tradition bequeathed by the efforts of Muslim Sufis, Hindu Sants and Sikh Gurus, such an outcome at the end of 1947 was too drastic and traumatic and remained an intriguing and perplexing puzzle. There were some peculiarities which rendered Punjab, vulnerable to violence in case the competing parties and their leaders could not agree to keep their province united. Among them the main factor was that nearly a million Punjabis Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs had recently been demobilised from the British Indian Army.

Additionally there were criminal gangs operating all over Punjab. These two elements and partisan government functionaries, politicians and ethnic activists formed nexuses that began to coordinate attacks on the ‘enemy community’. Once the Britishers were gone and two partisan administrations came to power in divided Punjab, whole-sale attacks on the minorities started taking place. By the end of the year ethnic cleansing had been achieved.

The main argument set forth in this study, The Punjab Bloodied, Partitioned and Cleansed: Unravelling the 1947 Tragedy through Secret British Reports and First-Person Accounts,
is that the partition of India was necessary but not a sufficient basis for the partition of Punjab. In other words, if India had not been partitioned, Punjab would not be partitioned. However, there was no logical necessity for Punjab to be partitioned if India was partitioned.

Why could not Punjabis Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs agree to keep their province united? Why did the violence that took place in the Punjab dwarf the violence that took place in other parts of India?

Fear of an uncertain future, lack of communication between the leaders of the estranged communities, the waning authority of the British and the consequent unreliability of the state institutions and functionaries created the social and political milieu in which suspicion and fear proliferated, generating angst among the common people.

In such situations, reactions and overreactions led to intended and unintended consequences which aggravated and finally resulted in the biggest human tragedy in the history of the Indian subcontinent.

The conclusion I reached from my research is that in March 1947 the Muslims started large-scale violence, mainly against Sikhs but also against Hindus, in the Muslim-majority districts of northern Punjab. Yet at the end of that year more Muslims had been killed in East Punjab than Hindus and Sikhs together in West Punjab. (IANS)
Next Story
Share it