The past week has been momentous with two important events: the election of Donald Trump as the 45th US President and the Indian government’s decision to demonetise the Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 currency notes.
Both had an element of surprise. While many opinion polls had predicted a Hillary Clinton victory, everyone, including the media, was unaware of the demonetisation till Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced it in an 8 pm broadcast on November 8. While it's hard to predict what a Trump Presidency might look like, it is relatively easier to foresee the impact of the demonetisation. Approximately 86 percent of the currency in the two denominations became defunct overnight.
These are four broad areas where the impact will be felt: the economy; politics and the security situation; the housing market and black money hoarders; and the ordinary people.
On the economic front, due to insufficient money supply, there is expected to be hoarding of smaller denomination notes. It is projected to result in a slower growth in demand. But these are supposed to be short-term, especially if the government can replenish the money supply.
However, the propensity to spend may decrease in short- to medium-term. Barring this, much of the money is going to be flushed out of the system. People with sound money are rushing to banks to exchange this, leading to parking of funds with the banking sector. Already about Rs 1.5-2 trillion has been deposited out of the total Rs 17.3 trillion of the cash, out of which over Rs 14 trillion is in demonetised denominations.
Another important impact is on the informal component of the economy, which is now slowly turning to banks to replace currency. This is expected to be again used for assessments of the size of this component in the economy. Also, as the government decides to tax unreported money above Rs 2.5 lakh, there is bound to be a rise in tax revenues.
The stock markets have already seen a decline due to the sudden move as well as due to the Trump ascendancy.
The second important impact is on politics and the security situation. With the Assembly elections in 12 states in 2017-2018, the biggest of them being Uttar Pradesh, with a population equivalent to Brazil, the impact could be considerable.
There have been statements from political parties of all hues on how the move is anti-people. The Trinamool Congress, the Congress, the Samajwadi Party, and the Left parties have all tried to question the government's move. While there is merit in questioning how this could have been done better, asking too many questions raises the risk of these parties being perceived as corrupt.
The nature of demonetisation demanded it is kept secret, as otherwise, people with ill-gotten money could have exchanged their cash for assets such as gold and other metals. The three-and-a-half-hour time frame saw investments by people to get gold and the like. However, the Income Tax Department is now looking at these carefully. Despite this, the impact of the decision has signalled a move to remove funding, which could have been used for gaining power.
Apart from this, the move also has important implications for the security dimension with it having removed counterfeit currency that could have been used for fuelling terror and Maoist operations. However, these are small-term impacts, and counterfeit money can again appear in the future. Modi has signalled that there is more to come in his resolve to solve the corruption conundrum.
The third essential element is on the housing market, and black marketers and hoarders. The property market is set to see a decline in prices as the stock of cash is removed from the system. Also, the 60:40 rule, which seemed to be the de facto norm, will most likely change as there will be a move away from cash. It will also reduce the size of the overall parallel economy.
There are reports of people finding some burnt counterfeit currency as these cannot be taken to the banks for exchange. Rumour-mongering is rife at the moment with prices of items such as salt rising. However, such rumour-mongering should is best avoided.
Finally, the impact on people has been huge. Everyday people have been queuing at the banks for exchanging their notes and withdrawing their currency in smaller denominations. The impact can be felt on all sections of society with the poor being badly hit. The rich and a majority of the middle class can pay through cards, but the poor have little option.
Another important facet is the urban versus rural consumers. While the urban folk will somehow be able to avail of goods and services, the rural folk being away from the banking system will find it relatively difficult to exchange their notes till December 30. The pain for most people is real, but it is time to behave humanely with those in need. Finally, the move shows a preference away from cash to a cashless economy.
The impact of these two events can only be judged entirely in due course of time. However, for the time being, the government should make provisions for a swift revamping of the currency exchange process as well as recalibration of ATMs for life to return to normal for the common folk. The decision has been bold and risky, and it is time for the implementation agencies and citizens to work together to improve the efficiency with which this can be done.
(The article is co-authored with Sankalp Sharma, Senior Researcher at the Institute for Competitiveness, India. Amit Kapoor is Chair, Institute for Competitiveness & Editor of Thinkers. Views expressed are strictly personal.)