Prasar Bharti needs autonomy, from bureauctats too!
The debate is raging on the independence of Prasar Bharti. The contours of the debate are pertaining to political interference in the functioning of Prasar Bharti, especially programming, editing, influence on editors, and compromised ability of editors and contributors to act independently. All said, the debate, put succinctly, is about operational autonomy of Prasar Bharti.
This all sounds interesting though we are missing the underlying struggle this country is seeing at this juncture after 67 years of existence as an independent nation. The struggle is about who would be controlling, ruling or managing this country? Further still it is about who – elected leaders or bureaucrats – decides the direction or path this country would follow. The fight clearly is about bureaucrats trying to wrest control of whatever independence is left away from the hands of the political and elected leaders.
The danger here is that operational autonomy is being construed and painted as one wherein the bureaucrat would have supreme independence to control the resources within Prasar Bharti. This is not only true for Prasar Bharti, but rather any enterprise that could be functioning under the realm of the state. Quite clearly what we can see is that the very idea of democracy is in danger and one single institution, the bureaucrats’ lobby, is working exceedingly hard to annex control of this country, its independence, the ability to contribute, decide the direction etc. In the least scathing manner, I can only suggest that the lobby cannot be construed to be fair, just to people and not absolutely corrupt under the influence of absolute power.
Not that they don’t control this country right now though the fight today is to control the country’s resources and towards having and yielding unimaginable power. The ethical and moral standards have gone down dramatically within the bureaucracy and it compels us to understand and dig deeper into the creation of the service.
Our system of bureaucracy started with the Indian Civil Services (ICS) which was primarily built to deal with the people of India to be controlled and regulated to behave in a certain manner. The fundamental fact thus remains that creation of ICS was to have power in British hands and manage the country through the ‘brown sahibs’. The system was not built to enable real democracy rather to control its population.
It could be said that most of the bureaucrats join to better the state of affairs of the country or any such noble ideas but they soon turn to doing something else, bettering their prospects while doing harm to others. The system forever has remained feudalistic and shall remain until we revisit and dismantle the existing systems of governance in the country.
This piece is clearly not against the persons involved but about the system they represent. IANS