A battle royale
Conflict brewing between the top cricketing nations and the ICC, who wants to govern with an iron fist, demands an amicable resolution before it escalates into a grim situation
The word 'imperial' has that touch of a legacy that one associates so strongly with the British empire of yore. The game of cricket was the domain of that empire and the ICC then was known as the Imperial Cricket Conference, the body that governed cricket around the globe.
The game of cricket when played correctly was defined as the imperial way of playing it. Australia, apparently, through some shrewd field placements, made the first move against the conventional and imperial way of playing the game. South Africa too made their mark by their bowlers mastering the googly.
But the man who played the magical "Indian rope trick" by inventing the leg glance was the first cricket poster boy of the world, Prince Ranjit Sinhji from the Indian state of Nawanagar/Jamnagar. He advertised products in the UK and was the blue-eyed cricketer whom people came to watch because of his mystical way of batsmanship.
"Ranji", as he was popularly called, had mastered the art of leg glance and could play it with such grace and precision that it left the spectators as well as the bowlers awestruck.
The imperial way of playing the ball was in front of the wicket, with fielders placed in front to stop the ball. However, the innovative Indian prince, so like his royal lineage of not utilising undue force, used the bowlers' speed and effort to direct the ball finely to the leg side boundary. The imperial way of batting, thereafter, changed forever.
In 1965, the world cricket body finally changed its name to the International Cricket Council (ICC) and the aura of imperialism was finally buried once and for all. The game of cricket was, however, still being governed and controlled from the Lords cricket ground by the powerful English and Australian boards. India and the other nations were at times mere bystanders to the rules and regulations being enforced and implemented.
Although India was a significant part of the cricket world, winning a few series and matches occasionally, they were never given the pride of place or status. India is now the hub of the cricket world with 80 per cent of the ICC's revenue coming from them. The reason for this rise is not a lucky dice but many years of effort from the BCCI administrators to popularise and commercialise the game on and off the field.
The change in Indian cricket emanated from the 1983 World Cup win and the shabby treatment that was given to the Indian cricket representatives during the final. NKP Salve, the then President of the BCCI, made a promise to change the tidings and India was the venue of the next cup final held in 1987.
The ICC, as one understands, had gradually dwindled to become a cricket body with just Pound 30K in their kitty when the astute Indian administrator, Jagmohan Dalmiya, took over the reins. At the end of his term, he left the ICC a few million richer and put in place a structure that finally paid the dividend.
Indian cricket both administratively and financially brought the riches to the table. Thereafter, under the ICC leadership of another good Indian administrator N Srinivasan, Indian cricket along with England and Australia were justifiably given a revenue package that recognised their contribution.
One now gets a feeling that a battle royale is brewing between the ICC and the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI). The body that governs cricket, has two Indians at its helm, in Shashank Manohar as its chairman and Manu Sawhney as its CEO.
Indian history is garnished with tales of Indians playing a part against a fellow Indian to bring the country down. This is precisely how the Afghans, Mughals and finally the British captured and ruled India.
Shashank Manohar, the former President of the BCCI, the man who fought to enrich the coffers of the BCCI during his term seems to be a man on a mission to bring the very cricket body he headed down to its knees. The internal court issues of the BCCI was an ideal platform for him to strike, knowing very well that the BCCI is helpless until the Supreme Courts hearings are completed.
The ICC once again is showing the imperialistic attitude of old. Unfortunately, the person heading it is an Indian. Recently, a report said that the ICC has hired the well-known consulting company Mckinsey to strategise their operations. This was done without any knowledge to either the Indian, Australian or the England board.
The situation looks to be heading towards a battle between the top playing cricket countries and the ICC who wants to govern with an iron fist. The popularity of cricket is growing by leaps and bound and one hopes that an amicable solution is reached before it escalates into a grim situation. Or else, the existing battle may just lead to war. Cricket, unfortunately, will then be the loser.
The writer is a former Test cricketer. Views expressed are strictly personal