NGT slams UPPCB for not taking action against petha industries causing pollution

New Delhi: The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has slammed the Uttar Pradesh Pollution Board for not taking action against pollution caused by petha industries in Kanpur, and directed its chairman to review the functioning of the board.

The green panel said the state pollution control board filed a report after a year and nine months of its order to the effect that nine factories inspected were found closed and order of closure was passed against some of said factories.

"We find it surprising that the inspection team comprised very junior officers and the report filed is highly unsatisfactory. There is no explanation why action was initiated more than one year after the order of this tribunal," a bench headed by NGT Chairperson Justice A K Goel said. The tribunal said nothing is mentioned about action against illegal ground water extraction and management of solid and liquid waste.

Though it is mentioned that the water was being used for domestic as well as industrial purposes, it is not clear as to whether requisite permissions particularly for industrial purposes were granted and if not, what remedial action was taken for the violation, it said.

It is mentioned that coal was being used as a fuel for the bhatties (type of a furnace) but whether any safeguards against air pollution and requisite consents under the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 were taken is not mentioned, the tribunal noted.

Perusing the report, the NGT noted that in some of the factories, in absence of chimneys, air pollution was being caused which was adversely affecting the environment and public health.

In spite of such damage to the environment and public health, no compensation has been assessed and recovered nor any prosecution initiated as required under the law, the tribunal said.

The NGT said such inaction is a failure of statutory obligation of the state PCB.

In absence of any other explanation, inference of collusion of the concerned officers of the state PCBs is not ruled out. It is surprising that though the report was sought by the tribunal from the state PCB, the report has been filed by a regional office, without the state PCB getting involved into the picture at all," the bench said.

The green panel said it would have been desirable that even if the report was prepared by the lower officers, the same should have been filed through the member secretary of the state PCB, after application of mind at the level of the state PCB.

The tribunal had given two months' time for giving of report but the action itself was initiated after more than one year. The report speaks volumes about inefficient working of the state PCB. For such failures, the officers concerned are required to be made accountable, the bench said.