Bofors: BJP leader urges AG to ask CBI to make its stand clear

In a letter to Venugopal, advocate Ajay Agrawal, who contested the 2014 Lok Sabha election from Rai Bareli against then Congress President Sonia Gandhi, alleged that "a wrong and motivated decision has been taken not to file any reply in the matter".

His letter assumes significance as the Attorney General, who has advised the CBI not to file an appeal, advocated that the agency should "canvass its stand as respondent" in the 12- year-old pending criminal appeal in which the notice was served to the probe agency on November 8, 2005.

Venugopal had opined that CBI should not file a special leave petition (SLP) in the apex court as over 12 years have elapsed and any SLP filed before the court was likely to be dismissed on account of the long delay itself. However, Agrawal in his letter to the Attorney General, alleged that the decision not to file reply in his matter has apparently been taken at a junior level and "it is being ensured that the Bofors case collapses in the Supreme Court."

"I have to tell you very frankly that it is possible that some officers have connived with the accused persons and are bent upon to derail the case," he wrote, adding that "the officers responsible for this need to be identified and criminal proceeding be initiated against those who have connived with the accused persons to derail the matter."

The BJP leader, who is arguing the matter himself in the apex court, said he has written three letters to the CBI Director since October 21, 2017 that the agency, instead of filing the appeal itself, should support his matter as a respondent with all necessary documents.

The appeal filed by Agrawal had taken a curious turn on January 16 when the apex court, 12 years after admitting his petition, had asked him to explain his locus in filing an appeal as a third person. The top court had said that when the CBI has not filed any appeal in the apex court challenging the May 31, 2005 Delhi High Court judgement, how could a private person file an appeal in the matter.

Justice R S Sodhi of Delhi High Court, since retired, had on May 31, 2005 quashed all charges against the three Hinduja brothers -- Srichand, Gopichand and Prakashchand -- and the Bofors company, castigating the CBI for its handling of the case, saying it had cost the exchequer about Rs 250 crore.

Before the 2005 verdict of Justice Sodhi, another judge of the Delhi High Court, retired Justice J D Kapoor, had on February 4, 2004, exonerated the late prime minister and directed the framing of charge of forgery under section 465 of the IPC against Bofors company.