Govt not to interfere with BCCI, says Sibal
28 May 2013 6:25 AM IST
Notwithstanding questions over BCCI in the wake of IPL spot-fixing, the government has ruled out interference with it unless it ‘becomes absolutely necessary’ but insists that the cricketing body should have ‘transparent’ and ‘objective’ systems in place to prevent malpractices, here on Monday.
Law minister Kapil Sibal said the government should keep away from sports ‘as far as possible’ as it could damage it. ‘Sports can’t be run by governments... governments getting involved in sports activities would ultimately damage sports,’ he said.
He was responding to a question as to whether government should step into the affairs of the Board of Control for Cricket in India as questions are being raised over its functioning in the wake of spot-fixing allegations. ‘I am not saying that in every situation, but as far as possible government should keep away. But when it becomes absolutely necessary, then there is no way out, then of course at that time government can take a position,’ he said. Sibal, a renowned lawyer, said sports organisations should be encouraged to find solutions for themselves.
‘If there are malpractices in sports, part of the solution lies in the organisations themselves taking a very strong view and cleaning up the mess from within,’ the law minister underlined.
When it was pointed out that there can be activities like match-fixing and spot-fixing in sports, Sibal said, ‘If there are criminal offences involved, the law should come into force.’
On demands for bringing BCCI under the ambit of Right to Information Act, Sibal said it was up to the sports ministry to take a call.
Former sports minister Ajay Maken had in December 2011 favoured bringing BCCI under RTI, arguing that there is ‘just and reasonable grounds’ for this.
BCCI has been rejecting any such move, saying it is a private body and RTI applies only to government organisations or those supported financially by it. The sports ministry under Maken had said that though BCCI receives no government funds directly, it gets ‘substantial indirect funding’ from the government in the form of ‘concessions in income tax, customs duty, etc’ and land at concessional rates for stadiums.
Law minister Kapil Sibal said the government should keep away from sports ‘as far as possible’ as it could damage it. ‘Sports can’t be run by governments... governments getting involved in sports activities would ultimately damage sports,’ he said.
He was responding to a question as to whether government should step into the affairs of the Board of Control for Cricket in India as questions are being raised over its functioning in the wake of spot-fixing allegations. ‘I am not saying that in every situation, but as far as possible government should keep away. But when it becomes absolutely necessary, then there is no way out, then of course at that time government can take a position,’ he said. Sibal, a renowned lawyer, said sports organisations should be encouraged to find solutions for themselves.
‘If there are malpractices in sports, part of the solution lies in the organisations themselves taking a very strong view and cleaning up the mess from within,’ the law minister underlined.
When it was pointed out that there can be activities like match-fixing and spot-fixing in sports, Sibal said, ‘If there are criminal offences involved, the law should come into force.’
On demands for bringing BCCI under the ambit of Right to Information Act, Sibal said it was up to the sports ministry to take a call.
Former sports minister Ajay Maken had in December 2011 favoured bringing BCCI under RTI, arguing that there is ‘just and reasonable grounds’ for this.
BCCI has been rejecting any such move, saying it is a private body and RTI applies only to government organisations or those supported financially by it. The sports ministry under Maken had said that though BCCI receives no government funds directly, it gets ‘substantial indirect funding’ from the government in the form of ‘concessions in income tax, customs duty, etc’ and land at concessional rates for stadiums.
Next Story
