Forests feel the heat
19 Dec 2013 11:23 PM GMT
IN A dramatic response to global warming, forests in high-elevation areas across the world have been ‘browning’ since the 1990s. A study has shown that forests have been steadily losing foliage and showing lesser photosynthetic activity.
When satellites measure sunlight that has bounced off the surface of the earth, different surfaces have different reflection patterns. Areas with lush foliage (where photosynthetic rates are high) appear green and areas with less foliage (where photosynthetic rates are low) look brown. The ‘greenness’ or ‘brownness’ of an area can be expressed through a formula called Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). The study used NDVI to study changes in tropical mountain vegetation from 1982 to 2006. The researchers concentrated on protected areas in regions 1,000 m to 6,000 m above sea level and selected 47 such areas?across five continents, covering more than 50,000 sq km, all located in the world’s biodiversity hotspots.
The study analyses how the photosynthetic rate responds to changes in two climatic factors – rainfall and temperature. Greening is caused by an increase in temperature and/or precipitation while browning is caused by an increase in temperature and/or a decrease in precipitation. Until the mid 1990s, the NDVI increased, indicating a?greening?across all the areas under study. Then came an abrupt shift, synchronous in all 47 areas, and the ‘greening’ became ‘browning’. ‘The ‘browning’ was with respect to the maximum greenness attained in each year – so it was a decline in the maximum photosynthetically active leaf biomass attained in the entire year,’ says lead author of the paper Jagdish Krishnaswamy?from the Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, Bengaluru. ‘Something was affecting the ability of tropical mountain vegetation to sustain the same canopy biomass in the early 1990s,’ he says.
While there was an increase in temperature in these areas, there were no clear trends in rainfall. The authors state that this causes what is called ‘moisture stress’ – an increase in temperature not accompanied by a concomitant increase in moisture. This usually causes a drop in photosynthetic rate, or?browning. The exact timing of browning varied between regions but was within a seven-year-period in the 1990s in all the regions. Anping Chen from the University of Princeton, who was not involved with the study, is not surprised by the synchronous shift. ‘Continuously rising temperature is usually regarded as the main reason for such a trend shift. In early years (prior to the 1990s), warming enhanced vegetation growth. Yet?continuous warming without an accompanied increase in precipitation in late years (during the 1990s) makes water a major limiting factor for vegetation growth, and thus the greening trend was stalled or reversed.’
By arrangement with Down to Earth magazine
When satellites measure sunlight that has bounced off the surface of the earth, different surfaces have different reflection patterns. Areas with lush foliage (where photosynthetic rates are high) appear green and areas with less foliage (where photosynthetic rates are low) look brown. The ‘greenness’ or ‘brownness’ of an area can be expressed through a formula called Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). The study used NDVI to study changes in tropical mountain vegetation from 1982 to 2006. The researchers concentrated on protected areas in regions 1,000 m to 6,000 m above sea level and selected 47 such areas?across five continents, covering more than 50,000 sq km, all located in the world’s biodiversity hotspots.
The study analyses how the photosynthetic rate responds to changes in two climatic factors – rainfall and temperature. Greening is caused by an increase in temperature and/or precipitation while browning is caused by an increase in temperature and/or a decrease in precipitation. Until the mid 1990s, the NDVI increased, indicating a?greening?across all the areas under study. Then came an abrupt shift, synchronous in all 47 areas, and the ‘greening’ became ‘browning’. ‘The ‘browning’ was with respect to the maximum greenness attained in each year – so it was a decline in the maximum photosynthetically active leaf biomass attained in the entire year,’ says lead author of the paper Jagdish Krishnaswamy?from the Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, Bengaluru. ‘Something was affecting the ability of tropical mountain vegetation to sustain the same canopy biomass in the early 1990s,’ he says.
While there was an increase in temperature in these areas, there were no clear trends in rainfall. The authors state that this causes what is called ‘moisture stress’ – an increase in temperature not accompanied by a concomitant increase in moisture. This usually causes a drop in photosynthetic rate, or?browning. The exact timing of browning varied between regions but was within a seven-year-period in the 1990s in all the regions. Anping Chen from the University of Princeton, who was not involved with the study, is not surprised by the synchronous shift. ‘Continuously rising temperature is usually regarded as the main reason for such a trend shift. In early years (prior to the 1990s), warming enhanced vegetation growth. Yet?continuous warming without an accompanied increase in precipitation in late years (during the 1990s) makes water a major limiting factor for vegetation growth, and thus the greening trend was stalled or reversed.’
By arrangement with Down to Earth magazine
Next Story
