EPFO asks staff to be alert while processing closed firms’ claims
19 Oct 2013 11:43 PM GMT
'All the field offices are requested to keep special watch and remain alert while processing the claims specially pertaining to closed establishment or establishment in respect of whom remittance have not been received for years. The instructions given in the matter of inoperative accounts should be followed strictly,' a recent official order said.
Inoperative accounts are those accounts where contributions are not made for more than 36 months. The Employees Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) has stopped crediting interest in these inoperative accounts. These accounts have around Rs 16,000 crore.
'The investigation has revealed that the fraud was committed mainly in respect of those establishments where remittances had not been received for many years, records not updated and the establishment had not submitted statutory returns. Further no pre-coverage or post-coverage inspections were carried out of the firms and no claims were received or settled since long,' it said.
Elaborating the modus operandi of such claims, the order stated, 'the fraudsters had submitted forged or fabricated returns, specimen signature cards and thereafter submitted fictitious claims in the name of original members or non members. Instances have also come into notice where returns were submitted after submission of claims.'
According to the official order, the claims were settled by putting pressures on the dealing hands by all possible means and in all these cases the amount settled had been sent through NEFT in the bank accounts opened with forged identity.
Inoperative accounts are those accounts where contributions are not made for more than 36 months. The Employees Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) has stopped crediting interest in these inoperative accounts. These accounts have around Rs 16,000 crore.
'The investigation has revealed that the fraud was committed mainly in respect of those establishments where remittances had not been received for many years, records not updated and the establishment had not submitted statutory returns. Further no pre-coverage or post-coverage inspections were carried out of the firms and no claims were received or settled since long,' it said.
Elaborating the modus operandi of such claims, the order stated, 'the fraudsters had submitted forged or fabricated returns, specimen signature cards and thereafter submitted fictitious claims in the name of original members or non members. Instances have also come into notice where returns were submitted after submission of claims.'
According to the official order, the claims were settled by putting pressures on the dealing hands by all possible means and in all these cases the amount settled had been sent through NEFT in the bank accounts opened with forged identity.
Next Story
