Great Expectations
On Thursday, the Supreme Court of India took yet another giant leap to ensure security of common citizens. The acknowledgement of the right to privacy as a Constitutional endowment comes for many as a reason to rejoice. The ruling on the highly contentious issue dealt with petitions challenging the Centre's move to make Aadhaar mandatory for people seeking to benefit from various social welfare schemes. However, there are some crucial matters that this verdict has not clarified. The Centre welcomes the Supreme Court judgement announcing that it agrees that privacy is a fundamental right that is subject to reasonable restrictions. In a media briefing at a press conference, Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad said that the "essence of the judgment is a wider affirmation of the crux of the observation made by the Finance Minister while moving the Aadhaar act in the house". The minister added that it is "unknown in civilised existence that a government was seeking to collect data of its countrymen without the authority of law".
With the nine-judge bench ruling against the government's stand on privacy, the Aadhaar case will now be referred to a five-judge bench which will hear a clutch of petitions challenging the validity of the Act. This verdict puts to rest any possible attempts to create mechanisms for intrusion into the personal lives of people in India. The judgment reads that "informational privacy is a facet of the right to privacy. The dangers to privacy in an age of information can originate not only from the state but from non-state actors as well." Meaning thereby that the Supreme Court judgment recognises that when it comes to privacy, the state is not the only institution which poses danger, rather there can be "non-state actors" as well that need to be kept in consideration. It is this that privacy activists in India have been highlighting with the rise of social media networks that have a strong hold over user data. The judgment further added the interpretation of the Constitution cannot be "frozen" in time and technological changes have created new concerns.