Don't pass the buck on health care
Healthcare, education and law and order are thought to be the main concerns of nation-states across the world. The Indian state has traditionally been unable to meet any of these, but the healthcare challenge seems particularly acute.
This is because the state has been, quite frankly, unable to meet the healthcare requirements of its people. India has one of the lowest numbers of beds and medical professionals per thousand people in the world. Similarly, the total spends on health care, as a percentage of GDP in India are extremely low when compared to most developed and even developing nations in the world. Within the overall expenditure too, that of the government sector (cumulatively, the centre and the states) is minuscule when compared with government expenditure as a percentage of total healthcare expenditure elsewhere. Also, the out-of-pocket spends on healthcare in India, as a percentage of total expenditure on healthcare, seems to be extraordinarily high.
Broadly speaking, there are two crucial aspects of healthcare. One is the issue of healthcare delivery, and the other is the challenge of healthcare financing. These two are clearly and critically interlinked. Healthcare financing often constrains healthcare delivery. The greater the resources allocated for healthcare - for building infrastructure like hospitals and medical colleges, the training of medical personnel, like doctors and nurses - greater will be the healthcare delivery capability of the nation.
Of course, the need for efficiently utilising existing expenditure cannot be ruled out and needs to be properly taken care of and monitored. But in no way does it suggest that additional finances and resources should not be allocated to the public healthcare system.
Another crucial aspect of the healthcare financing is who pays for medical treatment. At present about 70 percent of the medical expenditure in India is paid out-of-pocket by patients and their families. It has resulted in 63 million people facing poverty every year due to health care costs resulting from lack of financial protection.
The <g data-gr-id="60">draft</g> National Health Policy 2015 takes many of these points into consideration. The policy was released in December last year and proposed several key policy principles. These included among other things reduction of out-of-pocket expenditure and enabling universal access to free essential drugs, diagnostics, emergency ambulance services, emergency medical and surgical care services. The policy also clearly recognises that pubic investments in healthcare should rise to about 2.5 percent (proposed by most expert groups) at least and would be ambitious if it could go up to four percent of GDP. The broad principles also seem to be in line with the principles of Universal Health Coverage (UHC) being sought by the healthcare industry.
A recent position paper of the OPPI (Organisation of Pharmaceutical Producers of India) titled ‘Universal Healthcare and Sustainable Healthcare Financing in India’ proposes a framework for sustainable financing for UHC. It uses the principles of ‘progressive universalism’ proposed in a 2013 Lancet paper as an underlying principle to support hybrid financing of India’s healthcare needs. By 2020, the paper proposes that the healthcare expenditure as a percentage of GDP should reach 6.1 percent. It means a tripling of allocation to healthcare from 1 to 3.1 percent in the case of the public sector. Similarly, the number of beds in total should approximately double from 1.8 per thousand people to 3.5 by 2020. Also, there would be an additional requirement of 340,000 doctors by 2020. The paper also talks about varied models of healthcare financing across the world that offer clues to how India could look at solving its health care financing problem. The main points of the paper underscore critical elements required in building a robust healthcare system that to a great extent depends on adequate public financing.
The benefits of universal health care coverage leading to a healthy population cannot be overstated. These include improved levels of productivity, improved thinking and cognition abilities, greater ability and propensity to accumulate capital and reduced downside costs of diseases due to preventive health care. All these are critical not only from a healthcare viewpoint but also from a growth and competitiveness viewpoint. Investments in health care must be increased over the next few years in India from the dismal levels being witnessed presently in the public sector. Within the public sector, the joint responsibility of the Centre and the states in India should be treated as such, and none should look to blame each other for the lack of adequate funds.
(The article is co-authored with Sankalp Sharma, Senior Researcher at the Institute for Competitiveness, India. Amit Kapoor is Chair, Institute for Competitiveness & Editor of Thinkers. The views expressed are personal)