‘CAG audit RIL’s contractual obligation, must be met’
6 Nov 2012 1:19 AM GMT
Amidst a row over CAG audit of Reliance Industries' KG-D6 gas field spendings, petroleum minister M Veerappa Moily on Monday said audit was a contractual obligation and hoped that the company will abide by it. 'I have already gone on record to say that it is a contractual relationship between the government and the respective contracting parties... Audit (of spending on oil and gas fields) is part of this (contractual obligation),' he told reporters.
RIL had on Saturday stated that it had never contested the government's right to get spendings on the flagging KG-D6 gas fields audited by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) but added that the consent must not lead to a performance audit of a private firm.
'Let us not get into immediate on this. Allow them (RIL) to make a business,' Moily said. 'They (RIL) will abide by that (contractual obligations). We need not create problems for either for them (RIL) or for the government and CAG.'
The row over CAG's second round of audit of KG-D6 field erupted after the petroleum ministry last week postponed a kick-off or 'Entry Conference' called to commence the scrutiny of spendings in 2008-09 to 2011-12.
The meeting was called-off due to differences over the nature and scope of audit to be conducted by CAG, with RIL saying it was open to a financial audit but not a performance scrutiny wherein complex technical decisions like hiring of a particular technology may come in for questioning.
In a Saturday evening statement, RIL had said it ‘has at no time contested the government's right to conduct an audit by any agency, including the CAG, as provided in Section 1.9 of the Accounting Procedure of the Production Sharing Contract’. RIL said it ‘appreciates'’CAG’s reported statement that it does not conduct performance audit of private firms.
RIL had on Saturday stated that it had never contested the government's right to get spendings on the flagging KG-D6 gas fields audited by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) but added that the consent must not lead to a performance audit of a private firm.
'Let us not get into immediate on this. Allow them (RIL) to make a business,' Moily said. 'They (RIL) will abide by that (contractual obligations). We need not create problems for either for them (RIL) or for the government and CAG.'
The row over CAG's second round of audit of KG-D6 field erupted after the petroleum ministry last week postponed a kick-off or 'Entry Conference' called to commence the scrutiny of spendings in 2008-09 to 2011-12.
The meeting was called-off due to differences over the nature and scope of audit to be conducted by CAG, with RIL saying it was open to a financial audit but not a performance scrutiny wherein complex technical decisions like hiring of a particular technology may come in for questioning.
In a Saturday evening statement, RIL had said it ‘has at no time contested the government's right to conduct an audit by any agency, including the CAG, as provided in Section 1.9 of the Accounting Procedure of the Production Sharing Contract’. RIL said it ‘appreciates'’CAG’s reported statement that it does not conduct performance audit of private firms.
Next Story
