logo

EAC-PM set to rebut Arvind's GDP claims point by point

EAC-PM set to rebut Arvinds GDP claims point by point

New Delhi: A top economic advisory panel to the Prime Minister Wednesday rejected Arvind Subramanian's claims of overestimation of GDP, saying a point-to-point rebuttal will be issued in due course and that the former CEA by his own admission is "still unsure" about calculation of growth numbers.

The Economic Advisory Council-PM (EAC-PM) also asserted that any attempt to sensationalise what should be a proper academic debate about GDP numbers is "not desirable" from the point of view of preserving the independence and quality of India's statistical systems, all of which the former chief economic adviser (CEA) is familiar with.

In a research paper, Subramanian, who stepped down last year, has said India's economic growth rate has been overestimated by around 2.5 percentage points between 2011-12 and 2016-17 due to a change in methodology for calculating GDP.

Subramanian's paper titled 'India's GDP Mis-estimation: Likelihood, Magnitudes, Mechanisms, and Implications', published at Harvard University, also comes at a time when concerns have been raised in various quarters about the official economic growth numbers.

In its statement, the EAC-PM said the Base Year of India's income calculations was shifted to 2011-12 on the basis of recommendations of several committees with experts in national income accounting.

It was on the basis of these recommendations, started in 2008, that the government implemented the change from January 2015.

"Therefore, it is wrong to suggest that the views of experts have not been taken into account while changing the Base Year or weights or switching from Annual Survey of Industries (ASI) to Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) 21," it said.

It further said Subramanian has used cross-country regressions to estimate what India's GDP should be, which is a "most unusual exercise", as is the suggestion that any country's GDP that is off the regression line must be questioned.

The proxy indicators that he used can also be questioned, it said, adding that nor does this exercise allow for GDP increases on the basis of productivity gains. "A country's GDP is in nominal terms and any exercise should be on the basis of nominal figures, not real growth rates.

"The Economic Advisory Council will examine in detail the estimates made in Dr. Arvind Subramanian's paper and come out with a point-to-point rebuttal in due course," the statement said.

The EAC-PM further said that at the moment, it is felt that any attempt to sensationalise what should be a proper academic debate is not desirable from the point of view of preserving the independence and quality of India's statistical systems, all of which the former CEA is familiar with.

"These are certainly issues that Dr. Subramanian must certainly have raised while he was working as CEA, though by his own admission, he has taken time to understand India's growth numbers and is still unsure," it said.

On Tuesday, the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI) had said it follows accepted procedures and methodologies for arriving at projections of national income.

Team MP

Team MP

Our contributor helps bringing the latest updates to you


Share it
Top