Millennium Post

Boardroom blues for women in PSUs

Boardroom blues for women in PSUs
Public sector undertakings – more specifically, their boards of directors – could be a fit case for politicians to build their spiel on women’s empowerment in this election season. Statistics do not always portray a tale in the right light – remember the ‘lies, damned lies and statistics’ refrain? – but more than jest, it is tragedy that is borne out by statistics in this case.

It can go on. But there seems to be light at the end of the proverbial tunnel. With the new Companies Act making it mandatory for companies to provide for women’s representation on their boards, the vista has certainly become brighter for women, especially in public sector enterprises (PSEs). 

The Act requires every listed company to have at least one woman director within a year, and others reporting minimum revenue of `300 crore have three years to comply. But many experts are questioning whether the purported light is for real. For, the Act does not clarify whether the women directors on the board have to be ‘functional directors’ – implying they are hands-on officers and part of the company – or can be ‘independent’ ones as well. Experts believe most organisations would try and take the easier way out by appointing ‘independent’ directors on their board once the new Act is enforced from 1 April. 

Another aspect to watch out for is whether companies play the game in the right spirit and desist appointing renowned figures or government nominees to their boards in the name of diversity.

Among listed navratna companies that do not have a single woman director on their board are Bharat Electronics Ltd, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd, National Aluminium Company Ltd, Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, NMDC, Power Finance Corporation Ltd, and Rural Electrification Corp Ltd.
The scene is nearly similar in five other maharatna companies. While the numbers can be counted on one finger, these women representation are either nominees of the ministry concerned or are retired bureaucrats. According to Prithvi Haldea, chairman and managing director of Prime Database, which lists information on all capital market offerings, there are very few women functional directors on board of PSEs, and women directors represented as ‘independent director’ are mainly retired bureaucrats, who should not be seen as women representatives. Once the new law kicks in, PSEs will either have to appoint woman functional directors, which is not immediately possible, or get them from outside in the form of retired bureaucrats or ‘well-connected women’.

‘The point is to have good directors on board – be it a woman or a man,’ Haldea says. ‘It is good to bring gender diversity to get the other perspective but that perspective should be robust and independent in nature. Diversity is important but how that is brought is equally important; otherwise the appointments would only be in letter and not in spirit.’ To address this, he suggests a separate policy to define norms for appointment of women on board to get quality. With the Act in place, companies are spreading their net far and wide to tap good candidates. Some believe that the rush will intensify as companies have a limited pool to search from, while others say it is all about changing the mindset of the corporate world. Jatinder Peters, who was once the managing director of ONGIO International, a joint venture of Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) and ONGC, and retired as group GM (chief corporate affairs) of ONGC in 2012, says both parties are equally to be blamed for such a situation in PSEs. She says while many women opt for softer options and short working hours, equally the environment is not supportive. 

Peters believes the scenario can change if the new Act is followed in its true spirit. Reena Ramachandaran, who has headed Hindustan Organic Chemicals and is now member of the ad-hoc task force at the department of performance management, Cabinet Secretariat, also says while companies are keen on fulfilling the letter of the law there doesn’t seem to be much evidence that they are making an effort to nurture talented women into positions of leadership. Ramachandaran says there was no woman executive when she headed the Mumbai-based PSU.

Jatinder Peters says making it to the top is never easy for women in any field but it’s particularly difficult in the public sector, where women are held back from taking up more challenging roles for multiple reasons. ‘Sometimes even if women are willing to take up a job they are not allowed to,’ she says. ‘Besides, there is a limited talent pool to choose from, unlike in the private sector where the agenda is flowing more from the West. Thus, only a handful of women reach the boardroom (in PSUs).’

Peters believes that empowerment initiative by the government, aimed at giving women a stronger say in running companies, will give them more authority, which has not been ensured in the past. Stressing that this lack of empowerment reflects the societal mindset, she says though PSEs offer equal opportunities for both genders at workplace, little can be achieved unless that mindset changes.
The Companies Act’s mandatory provision for employing women directors on the boards is a welcome move, indeed. 

By arrangement with Governance Now

Jasleen Kaur

Jasleen Kaur

Our contributor helps bringing the latest updates to you


Share it
Top