Supreme Court to examine 157-yr-old law on adultery punishing only men
BY M Post Bureau8 Dec 2017 6:53 PM GMT
M Post Bureau8 Dec 2017 6:53 PM GMT
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to review the constitutional validity of a colonial-era law on adultery which punishes only the man even though the woman, with whom he has had consensual sex, maybe an equal partner.
The top court also said if the husband gives consent for sexual intercourse between his wife and another man, then it nullifies the offence of adultery and turns the woman into a commodity, which goes against the principle of gender justice and the constitutional mandate of the right to equality.
Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code states that "whoever has sexual intercourse with a person who is and whom he knows or has reason to believe to be the wife of another man, without the consent or connivance of that man, such sexual intercourse not amounting to the offence of rape, is guilty of the offence of adultery".
The offence of adultery entails a punishment of up to five years in jail or fine or with both. However, in such cases, the wife shall not be punishable as an abettor.
A bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud termed the provision a "prima facie archaic" and said this "tantamounts to the subordination of a woman where the Constitution confers equal status".
"Time has come when the society must realise that a woman is equal to a man in every field. This provision, prima facie, appears to be quite archaic. When the society progresses, and the rights are conferred, the new generation of thoughts spring, and that is why, we are inclined to issue a notice," the bench said.
It said it would examine the constitutional validity of the 157-year-old provision and issued a notice to the Centre, seeking its response in four weeks.
The court said it needs to examine why a married woman, who may have been an equal partner to the offence of adultery with a married man who is not her husband, should not be punished along with the man.
Secondly, the bench said it would examine if the husband of a woman gives his consent or connives for sexual intercourse with another married man, then does it not turn her into a commodity.
Next Story
In 100 bail orders: 'Videos' used for arrest in 44; 32 of these failed ...
22 Feb 2021 7:11 PM GMTDelhi Police say 1,753 held but courts heard over 4,347 bail pleas
21 Feb 2021 8:26 PM GMT755 FIRs and 342 chargesheets against 1,553 people later – not a...
21 Feb 2021 7:48 PM GMTOf courts' bugbears, most common 'doubtful' police, public witness...
23 Feb 2021 7:29 PM GMTA Delhi Police-sized roadblock in victims' path to justice — clubbing...
25 Feb 2021 7:39 PM GMT
Massive fire at Jhandewalan cycle market in central Delhi
20 May 2022 11:43 AM GMTGyanvapi Case: Don't leak info to media, only judge should open...
20 May 2022 10:45 AM GMTCreating ruckus in House lowers its dignity, debating issues raises...
20 May 2022 10:30 AM GMTSamajwadi Party leader Azam Khan released from prison
20 May 2022 10:29 AM GMTCBI action against Lalu as mobilisation against BJP happening in...
20 May 2022 10:08 AM GMT