US says recognition of Israel not part of Iran nuke deal
8 April 2015 12:30 AM GMT
Speaking after Israel proposed its own terms for the accord, Obama told US radio network NPR on Monday that demands for Iran to recognise the country go beyond the scope of the agreement.
“The notion that we would condition Iran not getting nuclear weapons in a verifiable deal on Iran recognising Israel, is really asking to saying that we won’t sign a deal unless the nature of the Iranian regime completely transforms,” he said in a drive to sell the deal to a hostile Congress.
“And that is, I think, a fundamental misjudgment.”
Israel’s government reacted angrily to the historic framework agreement on Iran’s nuclear programme announced last week, with a final accord due by June 30.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu demanded Sunday that Iranian recognition of the Jewish state’s right to exist be written into the agreement. Intelligence minister Yuval Steinitz told journalists yesterday that while an earlier pledge by Obama to back Israel’s security was appreciated, it did not outweigh the potential threat of a nuclear-armed Iran. “If Iran will produce nuclear weapons, this is an existential threat to Israel,” Steinitz said.
“Nobody can tell us that backing and assistance are enough to completely resist or to neutralise such a threat.” Steinitz proposed that the emerging deal between Iran and world powers should incorporate a total halt to research and development on a new generation of centrifuges, a cut in the number of existing centrifuges and closure of the Fordo facility for enrichment of uranium. He also proposed that Tehran detail its past nuclear arms research and allow international inspectors to make spot checks “anywhere, anytime”.
The deal will also see Iran reduce by roughly two-thirds to 6,104 from around 19,000 the number of uranium centrifuges which can make fuel for nuclear power but also the core of a nuclear bomb. Steinitz said that since the announcement officials have studied the proposals carefully.
“The notion that we would condition Iran not getting nuclear weapons in a verifiable deal on Iran recognising Israel, is really asking to saying that we won’t sign a deal unless the nature of the Iranian regime completely transforms,” he said in a drive to sell the deal to a hostile Congress.
“And that is, I think, a fundamental misjudgment.”
Israel’s government reacted angrily to the historic framework agreement on Iran’s nuclear programme announced last week, with a final accord due by June 30.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu demanded Sunday that Iranian recognition of the Jewish state’s right to exist be written into the agreement. Intelligence minister Yuval Steinitz told journalists yesterday that while an earlier pledge by Obama to back Israel’s security was appreciated, it did not outweigh the potential threat of a nuclear-armed Iran. “If Iran will produce nuclear weapons, this is an existential threat to Israel,” Steinitz said.
“Nobody can tell us that backing and assistance are enough to completely resist or to neutralise such a threat.” Steinitz proposed that the emerging deal between Iran and world powers should incorporate a total halt to research and development on a new generation of centrifuges, a cut in the number of existing centrifuges and closure of the Fordo facility for enrichment of uranium. He also proposed that Tehran detail its past nuclear arms research and allow international inspectors to make spot checks “anywhere, anytime”.
The deal will also see Iran reduce by roughly two-thirds to 6,104 from around 19,000 the number of uranium centrifuges which can make fuel for nuclear power but also the core of a nuclear bomb. Steinitz said that since the announcement officials have studied the proposals carefully.
Next Story
