Time to walk the talk

Recent unprovoked firing by Pakistan at the Line of Control and as well as at the international border shows the utter helplessness and desperation on its part. India has suspended the dialogue process as Pakistan opted to talk to Kashmiri separatists which the former said was against the spirit of the Shimla Agreement and Lahore Declaration. Subsequently, Pakistan resorted to unprovoked firing at the border with the intention to humiliate India and to aid infiltration of terrorists. Pakistan shelling has taken toll on civilian life.

Pakistan’s prime minister Nawaz Sharif’s attempt to raise the Kashmir issue at the 69th session of UN General Assembly was blunted by prime minister Narendrabhai Damodardas Modi who said that India was prepared to engage in serious bilateral dialogue with Pakistan in a peaceful atmosphere ‘without the shadow of terrorism’. Pakistan should engage in bilateral dialogue with India on basis of Shimla Agreement and Lahore Declaration that does not stipulate any involvement of a third party. He cautioned Pakistan that raising Kashmir issue in UN will be of no avail.

While Modi was speaking at UNGA and discussing with Obama in White House, some supporters of Kashmiri separatist organisations and Sikh separatist movement were demonstrating outside, but their numbers were far out numbered by Modi supporters.

Prime minister Modi and president Obama signed a joint statement and a Vision Statement for US-India Strategic Partnership and both jointly wrote an editorial in the Washington Post. ‘Chalein Saath Saath- Forward Together We Go’ is the clarion call jointly given by the two leaders.  Both the leaders expressed concerns over the growing threats of terrorism. But will the principle of Chalein Saath Saath hold good when Al-Qaeda and other terrorist outfit’s attack India from their bases in Pakistan? Prime Minister Modi has said that terrorism in India is not home grown but it is exported.
Will the US, which is seeking to rebalance in Asia Pacific and has called for ensuring peace in the region, advise Pakistan against its misadventure?

Terrorism is an issue India has repeatedly emphasised that needs concerted global attention and active participation by super power like the US to fight its menace to the last. How far is US sincere in dealing with it? Will US be an active partner with India in its fight against terrorism?

At the 69th session of UN General Assembly, prime minister Modi urged for early adoption of the Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism and to make the global body an effective instrument to fight the destabilising acts of non-state actors.

He also raised the need for reforms, both in the United Nations and UN Security Council by taking into account the contemporary realties. For reforms within the UN, Modi in his meeting with the UN Secretary General Ban Ki moon, urged that he can himself take the initiative of suggesting that countries contributing troops to UN Peace Keeping Forces should be consulted in the decision making process before the matter is put up before the UNSC.

Modi’s proposal for International Yoga Day at UN received instant support from Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka. Yoga, he said is a panacea for societal ills and can bring peace in individual and society. Reforms in the UNSC are urgently needed to effectively deal with the contemporary situation of conflicts and threats of terrorism. The UN should be an effective body in tackling global problems. Modi castigated interested powers to forms groups like G-7, G-8 and others to deal with the problems. The UN should be G-All.

Modi’s pin-pointed reference to the discrimination between ‘good’ and ‘bad’ terrorists might not have been liked by the US which draws distinction between ‘good’ Taliban and ‘bad’ Taliban. US and NATO powers support to insurgent groups trying to topple Assad regime in Syria brings into question the sincerity of world powers in fighting the menace of terrorism. Even the support to Taliban resistance during Soviet Union’s occupation of Afghanistan was an instance of supporting terrorism to achieve political ends.

But Modi was bold in raising the question- ‘Are we really making concerted international efforts to fight these forces, or are we still hobbled by our politics, our divisons, our discrimination between countries, distinction between good and bad terrorists?’ In an indirect reference to Pakistan and some countries in West Asia, he said, ‘Even today, states allow terrorist sanctuaries on their territory or use terrorism as instrument of their policy.’

However, Obama has underlined the need for continued comprehensive global efforts to combat and defeat terrorism, including joint and concerted efforts to dismantle safe havens of terrorists and criminal network, disrupt all financial and tactical support for networks like Al Qaeda, Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammad, D-Company and the Haqqanis. Obama has also urged Pakistan to bring the perpetrators of the November 2008 terrorist attack in Mumbai to justice. Will the US really walk the talk?

India had raised the issues of maritime security, cyber security, security in outer space apart from its homeland security. The 2005 Framework for the US-India Defence Relationship was renewed for next 10 years and both the countries agreed to reinvigorate the political-military dialogue and expand its role to serve as a wider dialogue on export licencing, defence and strategic cooperation.
However, playing to Modi’s homeland security concerns, Obama pledged to help India counter the threat of improvised explosive devices with information and technology. India is eager to purchase US-made mine-resistant ambush-protected vehicles. Modi’s plan to give visa-on-arrival to US citizens can cause problems. If persons like David Coleman Headley decide to visit India what would the
government do? IPA
Next Story
Share it