Teesta gets anticipatory bail in FCRA violation case

The court while granting bail to the duo also held that it does not find any possibility of the accused persons fleeing from justice and that their custodial interrogation was not required. Justice Mridula Bhatkar, however, observed that prima facie Teesta and her husband have violated the provisions of FCRA) and directed them to cooperate with the investigations and not instigate anyone to protest against CBI and not indulge in any criminal activity.

Justice Bhatkar was hearing the anticipatory bail applications filed by Teesta and Javed in connection with a case registered by CBI alleging that her company received Rs 1.8 crore from abroad without mandatory approval from Centre.

"Prima facie this court holds that there has been <g data-gr-id="27">violation</g> under the FCRA (Foreign Contribution Regulation Act). But where is the threat to national security and public interest? You (CBI) have to show the court this," Justice <g data-gr-id="22">Bhatkar</g> said.

"After hearing the CBI's submissions and perusing the documents, this court is of the prima facie view that there may be <g data-gr-id="28">misuse</g> of the funds received for personal use by the applicant accused. However, I am unable to find out any threat to the security, sovereignty and integrity of the nation or public interest," the court said. It added that a citizen may conduct social activities and may have a different point of view which may not be liked by the government.

"However, in a democratic state, a citizen can have his or her own point of view and it is the duty of the government to protect this view. A dissenting view cannot be said to be against the sovereignty of the government. It may be against the policy of the state," the court said.