SC rejects plea on Jat quota in medical courses
BY M Post Bureau2 April 2015 5:25 AM IST
M Post Bureau2 April 2015 5:25 AM IST
The Apex Court, which on March 17 had set aside the erstwhile UPA government’s notification to include Jats in the central list of OBCs to accord quota benefits to them, said the issue has already been decided and there was no “vested” right in favour of Jat students.
“There is no vested right in favour of the applicants under the notification in question and the right have been subject to the result of the writ petition which had been decided by the impugned order of this court dated March 17, 2015,” a bench of justices Ranjan Gogoi and R F Nariman said, adding, “no relief can be granted.”
Senior advocate Jayant Bhushan, appearing for some Jat students, said at the time of all-India counselling for admission in PG courses, Jats were in the OBC list as the judgement of this court had not come then. And now, when state level counselling is going on, the students of the community fall under the general category.
The students, who did not opt for all-India counselling for better choice of colleges in the subsequent state-level counselling, are “neither here nor there”, he said, adding that these innocent students have been caught in this. The bench said it had been made clear that such admissions would be subject to the outcome of the petition, which has been decided by it.
“There is no vested right in favour of the applicants under the notification in question and the right have been subject to the result of the writ petition which had been decided by the impugned order of this court dated March 17, 2015,” a bench of justices Ranjan Gogoi and R F Nariman said, adding, “no relief can be granted.”
Senior advocate Jayant Bhushan, appearing for some Jat students, said at the time of all-India counselling for admission in PG courses, Jats were in the OBC list as the judgement of this court had not come then. And now, when state level counselling is going on, the students of the community fall under the general category.
The students, who did not opt for all-India counselling for better choice of colleges in the subsequent state-level counselling, are “neither here nor there”, he said, adding that these innocent students have been caught in this. The bench said it had been made clear that such admissions would be subject to the outcome of the petition, which has been decided by it.
Next Story