SC moved for mental test of Delhi gangrape juvenile accused
19 Jan 2013 8:27 AM IST
The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice to the Central government on a petition seeking that the juvenile accused in Delhi gang rape case be kept in special custody if he was a psychopath and a threat to society and women.
A bench of Justice K S Radhakrishnan and Justice Dipak Misra issued notice on the plea contending that the heinous act of the juvenile accused points to wide possibility that he was psychologically an abnormal person.
The petitioner – Delhi-based Shilpa Arora Sharma – has pleaded for the appointment of a panel of national and international criminal psychologists to examine the juvenile to determine whether he was psychologically abnormal and a threat to society and women if allowed to be free.It sought that if the juvenile accused is found to be so, he should not be released and kept in a place of strict detention as such a person poses grave danger to society and especially women.
The petitioner has also urged the court to strike down Section 16 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of children) Act, 2000, under which the juvenile accused would get released without punishment despite most ‘grisly act’ committed by him. This provision of the Juvenile Act was ‘irrational, unreasonable’ and not based on the ‘fundamental principle of public policy’ and should be declared null and void.
A bench of Justice K S Radhakrishnan and Justice Dipak Misra issued notice on the plea contending that the heinous act of the juvenile accused points to wide possibility that he was psychologically an abnormal person.
The petitioner – Delhi-based Shilpa Arora Sharma – has pleaded for the appointment of a panel of national and international criminal psychologists to examine the juvenile to determine whether he was psychologically abnormal and a threat to society and women if allowed to be free.It sought that if the juvenile accused is found to be so, he should not be released and kept in a place of strict detention as such a person poses grave danger to society and especially women.
The petitioner has also urged the court to strike down Section 16 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of children) Act, 2000, under which the juvenile accused would get released without punishment despite most ‘grisly act’ committed by him. This provision of the Juvenile Act was ‘irrational, unreasonable’ and not based on the ‘fundamental principle of public policy’ and should be declared null and void.
Next Story
