SAT tells Sebi and RIL to clarify impact of new consent norms
16 Jan 2014 12:26 AM GMT
The tribunal, which had concluded its hearings on two petitions from RIL on 6 January and reserved its order for an unspecified date, set 24 February for the next hearing. Since Sebi notified the new consent norms on 9 January, after issuing the draft consent norms in May 2012, SAT sought clarifications from the regulator and RIL on the effects of the guidelines on the ongoing case involving the two.
‘Before we pronounce the order, we would like to know whether the RIL appeal will hold since new Sebi regulations are retrospective in nature,’ SAT presiding officer J P Devdhar said, giving time until 24 February to reply.
SAT has been hearing a seven-year-old case of alleged insider trading arising from the merger of Reliance Petroleum (RPL) with RIL back in 2007.
Sebi notified a stricter set of consent norms that exclude settlement of serious offences such as insider trading, front-running, violations of listing disclosure norms and illegal pooling of money, among others.
The new norms are retrospective and apply to all cases from 20 April, 2007. Sebi also excluded all pending cases from the consent settlement process and made it mandatory for an affected party to file for consent within 60 days of receiving a Sebi show-cause notice.
Earlier, senior RIL counsel Janak Dwarkadas requested SAT to fix a timetable for hearing RIL's consent application by Sebi once again, which the regulator rejected. According to him, Sebi was wrong in saying RIL's application could not be dealt with under the consent mechanism as the company had been clearly told on 15 April, 2011, that it could apply for a settlement through consent.
Sebi senior lawyer Darius Khambata maintained the regulator could not be compelled to settle a case through consent. Reliance is fighting two cases with the regulator —one challenging the new consent mechanism norms that Sebi had issued in May 2012 under which RIL's case was taken out of the settlement process, and the other seeking adjudication proceedings on the alleged insider-trading case dating back to the 2007 sale of Reliance Petroleum shares.
The consent mechanism allows firms and individuals to settle their disputes with Sebi by paying a sum without admission or denial of the alleged wrongdoing, but with disgorgement of any ill-gotten gains. RIL is also contesting the Sebi decision of May 2012 to keep the case out of the consent mechanism, suggesting the amount involved is too high.
The case dates back to 2007, when RIL, prior to the merger of Reliance Petroleum with itself, allegedly short-sold a 4.1 per cent stake in RPL valued at Rs 4,023 crore to prevent a slump in the stock. The RPL shares were sold first in the futures market and later in the spot market, covering the share sales in the futures market.
‘Before we pronounce the order, we would like to know whether the RIL appeal will hold since new Sebi regulations are retrospective in nature,’ SAT presiding officer J P Devdhar said, giving time until 24 February to reply.
SAT has been hearing a seven-year-old case of alleged insider trading arising from the merger of Reliance Petroleum (RPL) with RIL back in 2007.
Sebi notified a stricter set of consent norms that exclude settlement of serious offences such as insider trading, front-running, violations of listing disclosure norms and illegal pooling of money, among others.
The new norms are retrospective and apply to all cases from 20 April, 2007. Sebi also excluded all pending cases from the consent settlement process and made it mandatory for an affected party to file for consent within 60 days of receiving a Sebi show-cause notice.
Earlier, senior RIL counsel Janak Dwarkadas requested SAT to fix a timetable for hearing RIL's consent application by Sebi once again, which the regulator rejected. According to him, Sebi was wrong in saying RIL's application could not be dealt with under the consent mechanism as the company had been clearly told on 15 April, 2011, that it could apply for a settlement through consent.
Sebi senior lawyer Darius Khambata maintained the regulator could not be compelled to settle a case through consent. Reliance is fighting two cases with the regulator —one challenging the new consent mechanism norms that Sebi had issued in May 2012 under which RIL's case was taken out of the settlement process, and the other seeking adjudication proceedings on the alleged insider-trading case dating back to the 2007 sale of Reliance Petroleum shares.
The consent mechanism allows firms and individuals to settle their disputes with Sebi by paying a sum without admission or denial of the alleged wrongdoing, but with disgorgement of any ill-gotten gains. RIL is also contesting the Sebi decision of May 2012 to keep the case out of the consent mechanism, suggesting the amount involved is too high.
The case dates back to 2007, when RIL, prior to the merger of Reliance Petroleum with itself, allegedly short-sold a 4.1 per cent stake in RPL valued at Rs 4,023 crore to prevent a slump in the stock. The RPL shares were sold first in the futures market and later in the spot market, covering the share sales in the futures market.
Next Story
