Police custody of Tomar extended by four days
49-year-old Tomar, arrested in a fake degree case on June 9, was produced before Metropolitan Magistrate Preeti Parewa after expiry of his two-day police remand and the police sought extension of his remand by eight more days saying he was also needed to be taken to Munger, Bihar, to verify his address mentioned in the migration certificate of Bundelkhand University.
The police claimed that every time they visit a new place, “new documents” surface so they need to tally the specimen as well as the admitted signatures of Tomar and the university officials on the educational certificates.
Additional Public Prosecutor (APP) Atul Shrivastava said that last two days of the police custody were second Saturday and Sunday and it did not serve any purpose during their probe as the colleges were closed.
“We have to take him (Tomar) to Bundelkhand University, the place which we have not visited yet, as the fabricated migration certificate of BSc was issued from that university and it was submitted to Tilka Manjhi University, Bhagalpur, from where Tomar had allegedly pursued his LLB degree,” he said.
“The migration certificate of BSc issued by Bundelkhand University was of the year 2001 while Tomar had allegedly done his LLB first year in 1995. We need to ascertain this fact and require his presence over there during the investigation,” Shrivastava said, adding, “Tomar needs to be confronted with the teachers and his batchmates.”
Meanwhile, advocate Rajiv Khosla, who appeared for Tomar, opposed the police’s plea saying the very arrest of his client was “illegal” and cops have “mislead” the court in taking six days of police remand till now.
Khosla alleged that Bundelkhand University’s migration certificate was a “fabricated document” planted by the police.
“They (police) are seeking police remand just to satisfy the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi, the Centre and senior police officials. They want police remand to harass Tomar,” he said.
During the hearing, Tomar’s counsel said that this case was based upon documentary evidence and there was no need for police remand now. “Let the police go and recover documents and everything they want,” he said while contending that Tomar should be sent to judicial custody.
“Court cannot go on extending police remand for the same thing,” he said.
Meanwhile, Shrivastava said that as per the Supreme Court guidelines, 15 days police custody can be granted either at a stretch or in parts so still police remand of eight more days was left.
He also said several seals and signatures of authorities on educational certificates of different
universities, where Tomar claims to have studied, were to be ascertained for which his custodial interrogation was required.
At the beginning of the hearing, Tomar’s counsel opposed the presence of APP Shrivastava in the matter saying advocate Tarunvir Singh Khehar has already been appointed as special public prosecutor in the case so why a new lawyer was representing police now.
“Initially, advocate Khehar had appeared in the last three hearings in the case and now a new APP has come up. It is a mockery of the judicial system,” he said.
Shrivastava, however, clarified to the court that he is an APP and has been assigned this case by Deputy Secretary (Home) of Delhi government.
At this, the court said, “these issues will be dealt with afterwards and let the remand application be heard”.