Nine more judges suspended, Telangana-Centre row escalates

The development also escalated the row between Telangana Government and the Centre, with the TRS blaming the Centre for not bifurcating the HC following carving out of Telangana from undivided Andhra Pradesh in 2014.

Protesting against the action taken by the High Court, about 200 judicial officers working across the state decided to go on mass leave for 15 days beginning Tuesday. The HC had on Monday suspended two lower court judges after over 100 of them took out a procession and submitted a representation on their demands to the Governor on Sunday under the banner of the Telangana Judges Association.

The ruling TRS on Tuesday alleged that the Centre was being “insensitive” in not bifurcating the High Court so far. TRS Lok Sabha member K Kavitha said her father and Chief Minister K Chandrasekhar Rao even proposed to hold a protest dharna in Delhi over the issue. 

However, Union Law Minister D V Sadananda Gowda said the Centre had no role in the bifurcation of a high court. The state government blaming the Centre on the issue was “unacceptable and intolerable”, Gowda said. He also rubbished the TRS charge that the Centre was under political pressure from Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu.

“Creation of new high court for Telangana...it’s in the hands of Chief Minister and Chief Justice of that high court (which is common for two states at present),” Gowda said. “If the Chief Minister provides all the infrastructure and other things, rest of the things high court will take care. Simply putting the blame on the Centre, its not fair on anybody,” Gowda said. 

“Central government has no role to play. It’s not in our hands. But unnecessarily blaming the Central government, it’s not fair on the part of the Chief Minister or any persons of Telangana government,” the Union Minister said.  On the CM’s proposed dharna, Gowda said, “For no reason if he holds a dharna, people will evaluate the dharna.” Kavitha had, however, hastened to add earlier that the Telangana government did not want things to “escalate to that level” (CM holding dharna) and appealed to the Prime Minister to intervene on the issue of bifurcation. She said TRS MPs had raised the issue in Parliament and Rao had approached the PM “10 times” for bifurcation of the high court, but the Centre refused to respond under pressure from Chandrababu Naidu.

There was a “conspiracy” by the Andhra Pradesh government and some “Andhra elders at the Centre” in “Andhra Judges” getting the option to work in Telangana, she said. Advocates and judicial employees across Telangana launched an agitation on June six protesting the provisional allocation. They objected to the judges from Andhra Pradesh getting appointments in Telangana courts. Some 125 judicial officers of Telangana had on Sunday tendered their resignations to the Telangana Judges Association President, authorising him to hand them over to the Governor, if the demands were not met.

After the suspension of nine more judges today, Telangana Judges Association held an emergency meeting where they decided to proceed on a fortnight-long mass casual leave. “...nearly 200 judges under the aegis of Telangana Judges Association attended the meeting and passed a resolution to proceed on mass leave for 15 days,” a judicial officer said, adding it also passed a resolution demanding immediate withdrawal of the list of allocation of judicial officers between Andhra Pradesh and Telangana.

All India Judicial Employees Association’s general secretary B Lakshma Reddy had on Monday said non-bifurcation of the High Court was the root cause of the problem. Lawyers affiliated to Telangana Advocates Joint Action Committee held demonstrations outside courts across the state. Telangana Judges Association also gave a call for `Chalo High Court’ and a ‘High Court Bandh’ on Wednesday.

Police took several protesting advocates into preventive custody. Telangana Advocates JAC co-convener T Sriranga Rao had earlier said the allocation of judges was done by the High Court without taking into consideration the guidelines framed by the HC itself in February this year.