Man gets postal job after twenty-eight years

Twenty-eight years after a man applied for a job in the postal department, the Supreme Court has ordered his appointment noting that there was an error in holding him ineligible for the post.

Ankur Gupta had applied for the post of postal assistant in 1995. After being selected for pre-induction training, he

was later excluded from the merit list on the ground that he completed intermediate education from the “vocational stream”. Gupta along with other unsuccessful candidates moved the Central Administrative Tribunal which ruled in their favour in 1999.

The postal department challenged the tribunal’s order and approached the Allahabad High Court in 2000.

The high court dismissed the petition in 2017 and upheld the CAT’s order. A review was filed in the high court which was also dismissed in 2021, following which the department approached the apex court.

In the top court, a bench of justices Bela M Trivedi and Dipankar Datta said a candidate cannot claim a vested right to appointment, once he is included in the merit list, he has a limited right of being accorded a fair treatment.

The apex court said the employer, if it is a State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution, would have no authority to act in an arbitrary manner and throw the candidate out without rhyme or reason.

The employer-State being bound by Article 14 of the Constitution, the law places an obligation, nay duty, on such an employer to provide some justification by way of reason,” it said.

However, it was not at the threshold that the third respondent was considered ineligible.