HC asks Centre to respond to plea to recognise same sex marriages under law

HC asks Centre to respond to plea to recognise same sex marriages under law

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Thursday asked the Centre to respond to a PIL seeking a declaration recognising same sex marriages under the Hindu Marriage Act (HMA) and Special Marriage Act (SMA).

Issuing notice to the Centre, a bench of Justices Rajiv Sahai Endlaw and Asha Menon asked it to file a counter affidavit within four weeks. It also asked the Centre to respond to the points raised by the petitioners in an additional affidavit.

Petitioner Abhijit Iyer Mitra and three others have contended in the petition that marriages between same sex couples are not possible despite the Supreme Court decriminalising consensual homosexual acts. The bench tagged this petition with two other pleas -- one filed by two women seeking to get married under the SMA and challenging provisions of the statute to the extent it does not provide for same sex marriages, and the other by two men who got married in the US but were denied registration of their marriage under the Foreign Marriage Act (FMA).

All three petitions are now listed together for hearing on January 8, 2021. The high court had earlier sought responses from the Centre and the Delhi government on the plea filed by the two women and also asked the central government and the Consulate General of India in New York to respond to the petition by the two men.

The Centre was represented by Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma. The petition filed by equal rights activists Mitra, Gopi Shankar M, Giti Thadani and G. Oorvasi contended that homosexual sex has been decriminalised by the apex court but same sex marriages are still not being allowed under the provisions of the HMA.

This is despite the fact that the said Act does not distinguish between heterosexual and homosexual marriage if one were to go by how it has been worded. It very clearly states that marriage can indeed be solemnised between 'any two Hindus'. In this view of the matter, it can be stated that it is against the constitutional mandate of non-arbitrariness if the said right is not extended to homosexual apart from heterosexual couples, the petition, filed through Raghav Awasthi and Mukesh Sharma,


Next Story
Share it