After 2 years in jail, NCP leader Bhujbal gets bail

Mumbai: More than two years after he was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate in a money laundering case, the Bombay High Court on Friday granted bail to NCP leader and former Maharashtra deputy chief minister Chhagan Bhujbal, taking into account his old age and deteriorating health.

Justice PN Deshmukh directed the 70-year-old leader to submit either a personal bond of Rs 5 lakh, or a cash surety of the same amount by May 14. The judge took into consideration, among other issues, his old age and deteriorating health. A detailed order is yet to be made available.

The high court imposed several conditions on the Nationalist Congress Party leader. He will have to appear before the ED whenever required for questioning, and before the trial court when the trial begins, it said. Bhujbal was also directed not to leave the city without the trial court's permission.He must not make any attempt to influence the trial or the witnesses or tamper with the evidence, Justice Deshmukh said, warning that the bail will be cancelled if any of these conditions are breached. Bhujbal, who handled the Public Works Department in the Congress-NCP government, was arrested in March 2016 after an ED inquiry found that he allegedly misused his office in awarding contracts for PWD projects, causing a loss to the exchequer. According to the ED, Bhujbal awarded contracts including the one for the construction of a new Maharashtra Sadan -- the state guest house -- in Delhi to a private firm allegedly in return for kickbacks for himself and his family.

He and his nephew Sameer Bhujbal channelled the ill-gotten money into shell companies, the agency alleged.

Sameer Bhujbal, a former MP, was subsequently arrested and his bail plea is still pending before the high court. In December last year, a special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court here rejected Chhagan Bhujbal's bail application.He had contended that he had recently undergone angioplasty, and was suffering from various ailments which needed medical attention. The court, however, ruled that government hospitals were capable of providing adequate treatment to him. He moved the high court earlier this year seeking bail citing a Supreme Court order of November last year that struck down section 45 of the PMLA. The section imposed restrictions on grant of bail to a person arrested under the Act. He also urged the high court to consider his age, his ill-health, and the fact that the probe against him was complete and a charge sheet had been filed.Vikram Chaudhary, his lawyer, argued that several other accused facing charges under the PMLA were granted bail by courts across the country after the apex court's order.