Live-in relationship is no offence: Apex Court

The Supreme Court on Thursday said that live-in relationship cannot be termed as an offence as it has become an accepted norm in society.

“In the present modern time <g data-gr-id="42">live-in</g> relationship has become an acceptable norm. It is not a crime,” said a Bench of Justices Dipak Mishra and Prafulla C Pant. The court made the remarks while asking the government whether exposing a public figure’s live-in relationship would amount to defamation. The Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi replied that public should not peep into the personal life of a public figure and it serves no public interest.

AG was opposing the petition that sought to quash the criminal defamation law. He told the court that doing away with the law would bring anarchy in the society. 

 Meanwhile, the Supreme Court on Thursday directed Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) to produce call data records in sealed cover within a week before the trial court in Vijayawada in connection with tapping of phones in the backdrop of the cash-for-votes scandal. The court directed that the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate would not open it for four weeks. A bench of Justices Vikramjit Sen and Shiv Kirti Singh also extended the time given to the operators to submit the documents by a week and directed the court in <g data-gr-id="46">Vijaywada</g> to adjourn the hearing in the matter for a month.

It also kept the option open for the telecom operators to approach the High Court of Hyderabad for the redress of their grievances. The apex court was hearing the plea of Bharti Airtel, Reliance, Idea and others under the banner of Cellular Operators Association on whether the operators should obey the orders of the Andhra Pradesh government to disclose documents and electronic data relating to telephone tapping incident.

COAI had contended that operators were caught between the conflicting orders passed by the Andhra Pradesh and Telangana governments and asked the court to intervene in this “extraordinary” situation.

While the Andhra government wanted the data regarding certain cellular phone numbers to be disclosed, the Telangana government had prohibited them from parting with any information. 

Telangana even threatened them with prosecution under the Indian Penal Code, Telegraph Act and the Official Secrets Act if they disclosed the information, the plea said. A case was recently registered against Telangana Chief Minister K Chandrasekhar Rao for alleged illegal tapping of phones of his Andhra Pradesh counterpart Chandrababu Naidu in the backdrop of the cash-for-votes scam.

The alleged cash-for-votes scam had hogged <g data-gr-id="39">limelight</g> after <g data-gr-id="40">emergence</g> of an <g data-gr-id="34">audio tape</g> of a conversation between Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu and nominated MLA <g data-gr-id="32">Elvys</g> <g data-gr-id="33">Stephenenson</g>.