High Court to hear pleas to lift ban on BBC documentary
BY PTI13 March 2015 5:04 AM IST
PTI13 March 2015 5:04 AM IST
A division bench of Justice BD Ahmed and Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva posted the public interest litigations (PILs) for Thursday. The documentary is about the gang-rape of a 23-year-old trainee physiotherapist, who was brutally assaulted on December 16, 2012 in a moving bus in Delhi.
It kicked up a storm after one of the convicts Mukesh Singh was interviewed in Delhi’s Tihar jail.
The documentary also has comments from the convicts’ counsel AP Singh and ML Sharma, who allegedly made derogatory remarks against women.
The documentary caused an uproar among a section of people in India after the government banned its telecast in all formats.
The PILs said the ban on the documentary was in clear violation of fundamental rights under article 19 of the Constitution. They sought direction to declare as illegal the act of banning the documentary by the home ministry, ministry of information and broadcasting and Delhi Police commissioner. The trial court had on March 4, banned until further orders the broadcast of the documentary.
The pleas also sought direction for the Supreme Court registry to constitute a three-judge special bench to hear the appeals of the four death row convicts, pending since August 25, 2014.
The Supreme Court in July had stayed the execution of the four convicts in the case.
As per social media, the public at large wanted to see the documentary, as within a day of it being put up on YouTube, it was viewed by more 2.86 lakh people, the pleas said.
It kicked up a storm after one of the convicts Mukesh Singh was interviewed in Delhi’s Tihar jail.
The documentary also has comments from the convicts’ counsel AP Singh and ML Sharma, who allegedly made derogatory remarks against women.
The documentary caused an uproar among a section of people in India after the government banned its telecast in all formats.
The PILs said the ban on the documentary was in clear violation of fundamental rights under article 19 of the Constitution. They sought direction to declare as illegal the act of banning the documentary by the home ministry, ministry of information and broadcasting and Delhi Police commissioner. The trial court had on March 4, banned until further orders the broadcast of the documentary.
The pleas also sought direction for the Supreme Court registry to constitute a three-judge special bench to hear the appeals of the four death row convicts, pending since August 25, 2014.
The Supreme Court in July had stayed the execution of the four convicts in the case.
As per social media, the public at large wanted to see the documentary, as within a day of it being put up on YouTube, it was viewed by more 2.86 lakh people, the pleas said.
Next Story



