HC stays order bringing AGI’s office under RTI
27 March 2015 5:22 AM IST
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday stayed till April 27, its single judge order that Attorney General of India's (AGI) office is a public authority falling under the ambit of Right to Information Act.
A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice R S Endlaw said that single judge's findings "require consideration", so "We will hear the appeal filed by Ministry of Law and Justice."
It, however, said, "We have to stay the order of the single judge, otherwise the purpose will not be
served," and listed the matter for hearing on April 27.
The court's interim order was passed on the appeal moved by the Ministry against the March 10 order of a single judge bench bringing the AGI's office under the ambit of RTI Act as the top law officer performed public functions and his appointment was governed by the Constitution.
The counsel, appearing for the Ministry and the AGI, sought setting aside of the earlier order saying it was "bad in law".
During the brief hearing, the advocate representing RTI Activist Subhash Chandra Agarwal, on whose petition the single judge had passed the order, opposed the Ministry's request to stay the decision saying it was "a clear-cut and well-thought decision".
In its order, earlier this month, the single judge bench had declared AGI's office as a public authority, saying he performs the functions as are required by virtue of Article 76(2) of the Constitution of India and had set aside a December 2012 CIC order that AGI is not a public authority.
A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice R S Endlaw said that single judge's findings "require consideration", so "We will hear the appeal filed by Ministry of Law and Justice."
It, however, said, "We have to stay the order of the single judge, otherwise the purpose will not be
served," and listed the matter for hearing on April 27.
The court's interim order was passed on the appeal moved by the Ministry against the March 10 order of a single judge bench bringing the AGI's office under the ambit of RTI Act as the top law officer performed public functions and his appointment was governed by the Constitution.
The counsel, appearing for the Ministry and the AGI, sought setting aside of the earlier order saying it was "bad in law".
During the brief hearing, the advocate representing RTI Activist Subhash Chandra Agarwal, on whose petition the single judge had passed the order, opposed the Ministry's request to stay the decision saying it was "a clear-cut and well-thought decision".
In its order, earlier this month, the single judge bench had declared AGI's office as a public authority, saying he performs the functions as are required by virtue of Article 76(2) of the Constitution of India and had set aside a December 2012 CIC order that AGI is not a public authority.
Next Story
