HC grants bail to Jignesh in Rs 5,600-crore NSEL scam
23 Aug 2014 5:32 AM IST
‘I am inclined to grant bail,’ Justice Abhay Thipsay said asking Shah to furnish two sureties of Rs five lakh within two weeks.
However, when Shah's counsels Amit Naik and Aniket Nikam made a prayer to allow the accused to furnish cash surety of Rs five lakh instead of two sureties on health ground, the judge accepted it and granted bail.
The lawyers also argued that there was no likelihood of the accused absconding and hence he be allowed to furnish cash surety.
The court ordered Shah to personally appear before the investigating agency every week on Monday and Thursday until further orders of the trial court.
Since his passport has already been impounded, no order was passed for surrendering the travel document.
The state and intervenors (investors who lost money in the scam) in the case urged for a stay on the order granting bail to Shah but their plea was rejected.
A large number of investors were present in the court for the hearing of Shah's plea challenging the trial court's order denying him bail.
The trial court had on 24 June rejected Shah's bail plea on the ground that investigation was still on and he could tamper with evidence or hamper the probe if released.
Shah's lawyers argued he had played no role in the scam, in which his employees might have been involved, and had no personal knowledge of what was happening.
Shah said he was a non-executive director of National Spot Exchange Ltd (NSEL) and was not involved in its day-to-day operations.
According to his lawyers, after being arrested on 7 May, Shah had helped the Economic Offences Wing of Mumbai police investing the case by supplying documents and disclosing all information he had and so there was no question of tampering with evidence.
However, when Shah's counsels Amit Naik and Aniket Nikam made a prayer to allow the accused to furnish cash surety of Rs five lakh instead of two sureties on health ground, the judge accepted it and granted bail.
The lawyers also argued that there was no likelihood of the accused absconding and hence he be allowed to furnish cash surety.
The court ordered Shah to personally appear before the investigating agency every week on Monday and Thursday until further orders of the trial court.
Since his passport has already been impounded, no order was passed for surrendering the travel document.
The state and intervenors (investors who lost money in the scam) in the case urged for a stay on the order granting bail to Shah but their plea was rejected.
A large number of investors were present in the court for the hearing of Shah's plea challenging the trial court's order denying him bail.
The trial court had on 24 June rejected Shah's bail plea on the ground that investigation was still on and he could tamper with evidence or hamper the probe if released.
Shah's lawyers argued he had played no role in the scam, in which his employees might have been involved, and had no personal knowledge of what was happening.
Shah said he was a non-executive director of National Spot Exchange Ltd (NSEL) and was not involved in its day-to-day operations.
According to his lawyers, after being arrested on 7 May, Shah had helped the Economic Offences Wing of Mumbai police investing the case by supplying documents and disclosing all information he had and so there was no question of tampering with evidence.
Next Story
