Gag order on Prince Charles’ ‘frank’ letters unconstitutional, rules court
14 March 2014 4:55 AM IST
The 27 letters were written by Charles to members of the previous Labour government and have been described by Attorney General Dominic Grieve as ‘particularly frank.’
The 65-year-old prince has long held strong views in areas like the environment and urban planning and has been criticised for apparently using his unelected position to persuade ministers to change official policies through private letters, nicknamed ‘black-spider memos’ because of his scrawled handwriting.
Grieve, the government’s chief legal adviser, has blocked an attempt by the left-leaning Guardian newspaper to have the letters made public under freedom of information laws.
He has said that any perception that Charles had disagreed with the previous government of Tony Blair ‘would be seriously damaging to his role as future monarch because, if he forfeits his position of political neutrality as heir to the throne, he cannot easily recover it when he is king’.
On Wednesday the Appeal Court ruled that Grieve’s ban on publication was unlawful but gave him permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.
Grieve’s office confirmed it would indeed be appealing. ‘We are very disappointed by the decision of the Court,’ it said in a statement.
‘We will be pursuing an appeal to the Supreme Court in order to protect the important principles which are at stake in this case.’ Prime Minister David Cameron is backing Grieve’s efforts to ban publication.
The 65-year-old prince has long held strong views in areas like the environment and urban planning and has been criticised for apparently using his unelected position to persuade ministers to change official policies through private letters, nicknamed ‘black-spider memos’ because of his scrawled handwriting.
Grieve, the government’s chief legal adviser, has blocked an attempt by the left-leaning Guardian newspaper to have the letters made public under freedom of information laws.
He has said that any perception that Charles had disagreed with the previous government of Tony Blair ‘would be seriously damaging to his role as future monarch because, if he forfeits his position of political neutrality as heir to the throne, he cannot easily recover it when he is king’.
On Wednesday the Appeal Court ruled that Grieve’s ban on publication was unlawful but gave him permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.
Grieve’s office confirmed it would indeed be appealing. ‘We are very disappointed by the decision of the Court,’ it said in a statement.
‘We will be pursuing an appeal to the Supreme Court in order to protect the important principles which are at stake in this case.’ Prime Minister David Cameron is backing Grieve’s efforts to ban publication.
Next Story
