FTII students refuse to budge, threaten en masse hunger strike
8 Sept 2015 6:16 AM IST
“The students will be sitting on an indefinite hunger strike if our demands are not met by the government which has put us in this situation. There is no option left," FTII Students' Association (FSA) representative Vikas Urs told a press conference today.
The FSA, however, did not set any date to start the hunger strike. Meanwhile, the fast undertaken by a faculty member Abhijit Das of the Art Direction department of the institute seeking "immediate resolution" of the crisis entered its third day on Monday.
Referring to the fast by Das, Urs said it was "extremely disturbing" the way the FTII administration and the Information and Broadcasting Ministry were dealing with the issue.
“In a democracy we need to be heard on issues raised by us. No official communication has reached us from the ministry on the fast started by Das,” Urs said.
He accused FTII Director Prashant Pathrabe of not “doing anything to resolve the crisis” and adapting “a manipulative mechanism” to malign the students. <g data-gr-id="30">Pathrabe</g> on Monday met the fasting faculty member, who is sitting under a tree in a make-shift pandal and requested him to give up his fast. Das has been observing silence since he began his fast on Saturday after issuing a one-liner calling for immediate resolution of the present crisis being faced by the FTII students.
Reacting to the Supreme Court’s decision not to admit a PIL on the FTII imbroglio, an FSA representative said the ruling will have no effect on the strike.
"This will not have any implication on our strike. The PIL was not filed by students or ex-FTII students. So in no way it <g data-gr-id="37">is blow</g> to our protest. The students' body has at this point of in time decided to go ahead with an indefinite hunger strike," the representative added.
SC won’t entertain PIL on FTII row
The Supreme Court on Monday declined to entertain a PIL seeking its intervention to end the ongoing stir at Film and Television Institute of India (FTII) opposing the appointment of Gajendra Chauhan as Chairman. "We decline," a bench comprising Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice Amitava Roy said. The court was hearing a PIL, filed by Supreme Court lawyer Vineet Dhanda alleging that the Centre was not taking effective steps to bring back normalcy in <g data-gr-id="66"><g data-gr-id="69">the the</g></g> FTII at Pune which has been witnessing the students' agitation for almost three months now. "The more disturbing part besides the strike, started by students almost 82 days ago, is the dragging of students into politics by various political parties, thereby complicating the simple issue into an unsolvable problem at present.
Next Story
