Court for fresh property attachment proceedings against Dawood Ibrahim
18 Aug 2014 5:02 AM IST
A city court today directed fresh property attachment proceedings against underworld don Dawood Ibrahim and his aide Chhota Shakeel, absconding in IPL spot- fixing case, even after the Delhi police submitted that such action has been taken against them in 1993 Mumbai blasts case.
Following the court’s earlier direction, the Special Cell of Delhi Police informed it that properties of Dawood and Chhota Shakeel were already attached in 1993 Mumbai serial blasts case.
The court, however, was dissatisfied with the response and ordered fresh initiation of proceedings for attachment of properties under sections 82 (proclamation for person absconding), 83 (attachment of property of person absconding) of CrPC against Dawood and Shakeel in IPL spot-fixing scandal case.
‘Though there is a report furnished by ACP Special Cell regarding initiation of proceedings for attachment of properties but in the entire bunch of documents there is no statement by the head constable who carried out the process. ‘The documents filed are in Marathi language without translation. Even the document in Hindi is not proper. Let the document be filed in the language of the court,’ additional sessions judge Bharat Parashar said.
Following the court’s earlier direction, the Special Cell of Delhi Police informed it that properties of Dawood and Chhota Shakeel were already attached in 1993 Mumbai serial blasts case.
The court, however, was dissatisfied with the response and ordered fresh initiation of proceedings for attachment of properties under sections 82 (proclamation for person absconding), 83 (attachment of property of person absconding) of CrPC against Dawood and Shakeel in IPL spot-fixing scandal case.
‘Though there is a report furnished by ACP Special Cell regarding initiation of proceedings for attachment of properties but in the entire bunch of documents there is no statement by the head constable who carried out the process. ‘The documents filed are in Marathi language without translation. Even the document in Hindi is not proper. Let the document be filed in the language of the court,’ additional sessions judge Bharat Parashar said.
Next Story
