MillenniumPost
Business

India, EU ask WTO dispute settlement body not to adopt ruling on ICT import duties till Dec 18

New Delhi: India and the European Union have again asked the WTO’s dispute settlement body not to adopt a ruling against New Delhi’s import duties on certain information and technology products till December 18 as both sides are engaged in bilateral talks to resolve the matter.

Earlier, the two regions sought time till September 19 by making a similar request in June.

The WTO’s dispute settlement body (DSB) will meet on September 19 in which it would consider adopting a draft decision shared by India and the European Union (EU).

“We consider that the draft DSB decision, if adopted, would facilitate the resolution of the dispute,” according to a communication of the World Trade Organisation (WTO).

For that meeting, they urged the DSB not to adopt the WTO’s dispute settlement panel’s ruling of April 17, which stated that India’s import duties on certain information and technology products are inconsistent with the global trade norms.

As per the rules of the WTO, the panel’s ruling will have to be adopted by the DSB for implementation within 60 days of the release of the order. However, the complainant and defendant can mutually request for deferment of adoption of the ruling.

According to the draft decision submitted by the two regions for the body: “The DSB agrees that, upon a request by the European Union or India, the DSB shall no later than 18 December 2023 adopt the report of the panel in the dispute India - Tariff Treatment on Certain Goods in the Information and Communications Technology Sector of 17 April 2023”.

The development assumes significance as India and the EU are negotiating a free trade agreement. So far, four rounds of talks have happened.

In its report, the dispute panel of WTO on April 17 said that import duties imposed by India on certain information and technology products violate global trading norms.

The ruling followed a dispute filed by the EU, Japan and Taiwan against these duties in WTO.

Next Story
Share it