1984 riots case: SC dismisses Sajjan’s plea
5 Dec 2013 4:37 AM IST
In a setback to Congress leader Sajjan Kumar, the Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed his plea for quashing of charges against him in a 1984 anti-Sikh riots case.
A bench headed by justice A K Patnaik refused to grant relief to the former MP who approached the apex court challenging the trial court and the Delhi High Court orders turning down his plea for quashing of charges against him.
The bench also dismissed the similar pleas of other accused, Ved Prakash Pial and Brahmanand Gupta in the case. The trial court had in July 2010 framed various charges including murder and rioting against Sajjan Kumar, Brahmanand Gupta, Peru, Khushal Singh and Ved Prakash Pial in connection with killing of a man in Sultanpuri area in the riots that had occurred after the assassination of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on 31 October, 1984. Accused Khushal Singh died during pendency of the case.
Dismissing Kumar’s plea, the high court had affirmed the trial court’s order, saying charges could be framed if there is a strong suspicion leading the court to think there is ground for presuming that the accused has committed the offence. The high court had also rejected the pleas of Pial and Gupta challenging the framing of charges against them.
The high court had, however, refused to frame additional charge of conspiracy against Kumar, Pial and Gupta, saying there is ‘no evidence to show the meeting of minds’.
A bench headed by justice A K Patnaik refused to grant relief to the former MP who approached the apex court challenging the trial court and the Delhi High Court orders turning down his plea for quashing of charges against him.
The bench also dismissed the similar pleas of other accused, Ved Prakash Pial and Brahmanand Gupta in the case. The trial court had in July 2010 framed various charges including murder and rioting against Sajjan Kumar, Brahmanand Gupta, Peru, Khushal Singh and Ved Prakash Pial in connection with killing of a man in Sultanpuri area in the riots that had occurred after the assassination of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on 31 October, 1984. Accused Khushal Singh died during pendency of the case.
Dismissing Kumar’s plea, the high court had affirmed the trial court’s order, saying charges could be framed if there is a strong suspicion leading the court to think there is ground for presuming that the accused has committed the offence. The high court had also rejected the pleas of Pial and Gupta challenging the framing of charges against them.
The high court had, however, refused to frame additional charge of conspiracy against Kumar, Pial and Gupta, saying there is ‘no evidence to show the meeting of minds’.
Next Story
