SC questions practice banning women’s entry to Sabarimala

Update: 2016-05-03 12:12 GMT
The Supreme Court on Monday questioned the centuries-old practice of barring entry of women between the age group of 10 to 50 years to the Sabarimala temple in Kerala, saying it would test whether “faith and belief” can differentiate among persons of same “denominations”.

“The question should there be such a religious practice, which creates a dent on the concept of gender equality. You must have some kind of cosmopolitan belief which treats denominations of same faith equally,” a Bof justices Dipak Misra, V Gopala Gowda and Kurian Joseph said.

The “tussle” and “differentiation” between the right of men and women will have to withstand constitutional scrutiny, it said when senior advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for the Travancore Devaswom Board which manages the hill-top shrine, vehemently said, “Nobody, possibly the court also, can question the faith and belief.” 

Venugopal, referring to an Apex Court judgement, said such a judicial intervention would cause “injustice” to the age- old faith and belief and would adversely affect religious institutions of all faiths.

He also said the President of Indian Young Lawyers’ Association, which has filed the PIL on the issue, is a practicising Muslim and now demands have started coming up for allowing entry of women in the Haji Ali shrine in Mumbai in west Indian state of Maharashtra which, they say, is against their religious practices. He also reiterated that women are not discriminated on the ground of gender as girls and women of a particular age-group are allowed.

At the outset, the counsel for Rajya Sabha MP Rajeev Chandrasekhar sought to intervene in the ongoing hearing of the PIL. Favouring the age-old traditions, he said the devotees of Lord Ayyappa at Sabarimala have a “fundamental right of practicing their religion in accordance with the beliefs, cultural traditions and rituals associated with the particular deity i.e., the celibate Lord Ayyappa who presides over the Sabarimala Temple”.

Besides, advocate ML Sharma and two Kerala- based organisations  also sought nod to intervene.

Similar News