The police told the court that as per the forensic reports of digital video recorders (DVRs) of 20 CCTV cameras installed at the MP’s residence where the incident took place, some of their contents have been ‘formatted’ and Dhananjay had handed over these footages to investigators after a lapse of around 15 hours.
Additional public prosecutor Mukul Kumar told the court that although Dhananjay had filed a plea seeking divorce from Jagriti in August this year, he was in constant touch with her and one of the maids,
Meena, had told the investigators that the MP had hit her once with slippers.
The court, which concluded hearing the arguments on the bail plea, reserved its order for 20 November.
During the hearing on the bail petition, senior advocate Hariharan, who appeared for Dhananjay, argued it was his client, who had informed the police about the incident at 175, South Avenue here. He also told the court that his client was not in Delhi from 1 November to 4 November, when the incident took place.
Additional public prosecutor Mukul Kumar told the court that although Dhananjay had filed a plea seeking divorce from Jagriti in August this year, he was in constant touch with her and one of the maids,
Meena, had told the investigators that the MP had hit her once with slippers.
The court, which concluded hearing the arguments on the bail plea, reserved its order for 20 November.
During the hearing on the bail petition, senior advocate Hariharan, who appeared for Dhananjay, argued it was his client, who had informed the police about the incident at 175, South Avenue here. He also told the court that his client was not in Delhi from 1 November to 4 November, when the incident took place.