While Jafri’s son Tanvir said that court has relied on a ‘totally false’ evidence, kin of some other victims said that the firing by him was done in ‘self defence’. One of the witnesses even said that there was no firing by Jafri, which he had testified before the court.
Special SIT court judge PB Desai on Friday said that the firing by Jafri, which killed one person, provoked the mob that led it to the ‘killing frenzy’, but asserted that the firing cannot condone the acts of the mob.
“It was the private firing by Shri Ehsan Jafri that acted as a catalyst and which infuriated the mob to such an extent that it went out of control, the limited police force available there had no means to control or disperse such mob, which had gathered in large numbers post the incident of private firing,” the court said in its order.
However, Tanvir and some eyewitnesses questioned the conclusion drawn by the judge. “We are not at all in agreement with the judgement, wherein the court said that the private firing of Ehsan Jafri provoked mob into a killing frenzy. The court has relied on some evidence, which is totally false,” Tanvir said.
“Defence lawyer could not present a single witness who could testify to the fact that they saw Jafri saheb firing from his gun. They referred to a statement by someone who is both a victim and witness, who said in his statement before the police that Jafri saheb fired from his gun. He was not even presented to testify before the court,” he added.