Khori village: SC asks civic body to indicate time line for rehabilitating eligible persons

New Delhi: The Supreme Court Monday asked the Faridabad municipal corporation to indicate the time line required for rehabilitating eligible people, who were residing in Khori village where unauthorised structures which came under Aravali forest area were removed.

The top court, while observing that it will hold somebody responsible for the situation which led to mushrooming of the area into slums or rather unauthorised constructions, suggested to the counsel appearing for the civic body that the corporation may examine if, after basic scrutiny of application filed by those seeking rehabilitation, provisional allotment can be made with a week.

A bench comprising justices A M Khanwilkar and Dinesh Maheshwari made it clear that provisional allotment can be done subject to an undertaking that if the person fails to satisfy the genuineness of documents or his claims regarding eligibility, then he will vacate the premises on his own failing which he will be removed by the police.

If the application is received today with minimum documents which are good enough to process the file, verification of documents may take six weeks, no difficulty but provisional allotment can be made to that person so that he need not wait for eight weeks till you finally take a decision, the bench said.

The bench said this after the corporation's counsel said they are likely to finalise the list of eligible persons soon and then start making allotment.

When the bench asked his about the time taken in the process after receiving application, he said it can take eight weeks.

There is a suggestion for you. Preliminary scrutiny on receipt of application can be done within a week and provisional allotment can be made if the person is found to be eligible, subject to verification of documents. After verification, if you find that the document is forged or manipulated, then that person will have to vacate immediately up on the decision being taken, the bench observed.

The counsel said he would get back to the court on this aspect.

During the arguments, senior advocates Colin Gonsalves and Sanjay Parikh, appearing for some of the petitioners including those who are residents of the village, pointed out towards difficulties faced by people there and claimed that adequate basic facilities were not being provided to them, including those who are in temporary accommodation.

The corporation's counsel referred to the affidavit filed by the civic body containing details about the nature of temporary arrangement made in respect of persons affected due to demolition of unauthorised structures standing on forest land.

While refuting the claims, he said temporary accommodation and food, water and other basic amenities are being provided there. Instead of going into this debate and disputed questions, we called upon the counsel for the corporation to indicate the time line required for rehabilitating the eligible persons after due scrutiny and finding them to be eligible for such rehabilitation, the bench said in its order and posted the matter for further hearing on

September 13.