HC seeks DoE’s response on DPS Dwarka’s plea challenging order to reinstate students

Update: 2025-05-29 18:52 GMT

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Thursday sought response of the Directorate of Education on a plea by Delhi Public School, Dwarka, challenging a DoE’s order directing the institution to reinstate the 31 students who were expelled for non-payment of hiked fees.

Justice Vikas Mahajan issued notice to the Delhi government’s Directorate of Education (DoE) on the school’s petition and asked it to file its reply within six weeks.

The court listed the matter for further hearing on August 28, when another petition by over 100 parents seeking protection of their children amid the ongoing fee hike issue was also fixed.

During the hearing, the counsel for the school urged the court to stay the DoE’s May 15 order directing the school to withdraw the strike off orders issued on May 9 and reinstate the fee defaulter students on the school rolls.

The court also issued notice on a plea by several parents seeking to be impleaded and heard in the case.

The school claimed that the DoE’s order was ex-facie arbitrary and contrary to the law and that it failed to provide any cogent reasons for the school to reinstate the names of the fee defaulter students.

It said the order was against the provisions of the Delhi School Education Act and Rules, 1973, which empowered the head of the school to strike off the names on account of non-payment of fees.

The high court recently directed that parents, embroiled in fee dispute with DPS Dwarka, to deposit 50 per cent of the hiked fees for academic year 2025-26 following which their wards will be allowed to continue their studies in the classes.

The court clarified that the rebate of 50 per cent is on the hiked component of the fee and the base fee should be

paid in full.

The Delhi High Court, hearing a petition by 102 parents over the fee hike at DPS Dwarka, declined interim relief for the 2025–26 academic year, noting no evidence that the Directorate of Education had rejected the school’s fee structure for 2024–25.

The parents had also sought government and lieutenant governor intervention in the school’s management. 

Similar News